![]() My only real complaint was the trigger, which was fine for defensive distances, and that’s really all it was meant for I suspect. I have no complaints regarding its reliability. Suffice it to say I had zero malfunctions. It ran everything, and it had a mechanical feel to reloading that I appreciated. I stretched this gun out to 650 rounds for testing with a few loosies mixed in from a bag of over-carried self-defense rounds. The gun is small, but I did find my shooting got better when I changed out the backstrap with the provided alternative. (Photo: Paul Peterson/)Īccuracy is always a bit relative, and the Stance gave me a good but never great or terrible performance. Not my best shooting, but not my worst from 10 yards. Sure, it’s somewhat small and harder to manipulate, but it trims the overall width to below an inch. Even the ambidextrous slide-catch lever is recessed into the frame. The tactical appeal of single-hand reloads is really less appealing to me than the obvious slim and snag-free design for concealed carry. The rear sight is also snag-resistant with a forward-sweeping angle at the rear coupled with a flat, forward-angle design at the front for one-handed reloads. Plus, if desired, there are night-sight-ready options as well. Occasionally, I’ve noticed that front and rear sights of the same size and color compete with each other, but that’s just not the case with the Stance. That’s partly thanks to the U-notch rear and the fact that the front dot is nearly twice the size of the two rear white dots. ![]() It’s quick to acquire when presenting the Stance on a target. The metal sights were a hit for me, with a very bright and large orange front dot that popped up fast. (Photo: Paul Peterson/)įor instance, the front sight is a bold and oversized orange front dot that springs into view for me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |